Shell Didn’t Really Just Make That Investment…


Fascinating week in oil! As you may have seen in the headlines, oil prices went negative. Specifically West Texas Intermediate (the benchmark for US crude oil) oil price went negative for two days because they’re traded as futures contracts. Production has barely changed but usage has sunk so we have way more supply than we can even really manage to store!

Could this be a wake up call for gas giants to finally bend to the loss from fossil-fuel-divested investing and commit to green energy? Shell this month announced that it aims to reduce its emissions to net-zero by 2050. Sounds fancy for an oil company to go net-zero but they’re only focusing on removing the carbon footprint from the manufacturing of its products, not the use of those products themselves. They’ll also be offsetting anything that can’t be cut entirely. All this while they’re building a $6 billion petrochemical plant in Pennsylvania (fun fact– the state has promised $1 billion in tax breaks for the project and allow them to release 2.2 million tons of carbon dioxide each year).

Back in September Nestlé also said that it would go “net zero” by 2050, even though most of its competitors have reduction goals for 2030 or even earlier.

SO – Can old dogs learn new tricks? Maybe not after all.

2050 is a nice round number that sounds nice and doesn’t seem too far away, but it doesn’t mean action now, and 30 years is a long time to forget about what a company promised (or for them to blame the old guard). It sounds like commitment, but it seems to be the new number for companies looking to green-wash instead of actually changing their practices.

Share this post →


A weekly newsletter helping climate founders and investors discover undercover climate startups, technologies and opportunities before everyone else. Written by founders, executives and investors with years across the climate-tech space. Subscribe for free today to grow your climate positive impact.

Related posts...

Conservation’s Crucial Role as a Carbon Sink

Conservation, as we’ve seen, is vastly important. It takes much more time to break, remake, and then wait for the gains to hopefully reappear. Governments and businesses alike must adjust their definition of value so that the long-term benefits of our environmental impact weigh more heavily than the short-term cost of investment and a quick turnaround to profitability.

Read now ➜

Lake Kivu • The Danger Of A Limnic Eruption

Lake Kivu is one of the African Great Lakes, located on the border between the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Rwanda. Its claim to fame is not pristine waters, rare fish, or an elegant shoreline. Instead, Lake Kivu, along with Lake Nyos and Lake Monoun, share the deadly habit of sporadically belching massive gas clouds of carbon dioxide.

Read now ➜

Everyone Should Understand The Carbon Cycle

Measuring carbon levels is important because it is our planet’s natural thermometer. Earth’s atmosphere regulates temperature and will respond to extreme imbalances much like how the human body does once it reaches an internal temperature of around 104°F (40°C): the major organs that give us life will begin to break down.

Read now ➜

Discover Pre Series-A Climate Startups Weekly

Develop your market map of up-and-coming climate startups and market opportunities by subscribing to our weekly newsletter for free.